Your texts are dark red, those of "Atheisme: the capital man" are in black.
I don't know what to say at this point
(Protestant / September 27, 2006 - 03:50 am)
God born out of man's nonsense
(Atheist / September 25, 2006 - 02:42 am)
I dont belive in god, i'm my own god, i belive in me, that if i dont get up to go to work i cant pay my bills & so on. so I am my own god.
(Atheist / September 22, 2006 - 01:53 am)
Tired of wars based on religion and it still amazes me what people are hypnotized into believing.
(Agnostic / September 20, 2006 - 09:04 am)
I wonder why those who believe in Christ as "part of" the Creator of the Universe not call that Creator by the same name Christ did? Christ did not call his Creator "God", he used a "jewish" and/or at least a word from that "period". The word "God" is from a "Goth" culture that existed much later. There are two names in the Christian Bible for the Creator of the Universe: Yahweh, and Elohim from the two founding tribes of the nation called "Israel". John calls it the "Word", a perversion of the Greek concept of "logos" meaning "logic as described by sound using words". It got translated later to "the Word" but at least it is an "energy" and not a "person". The Jewish meanings for the ONE are: IT that has no name, no form, etc...
To refer to the ONE "God" as a "Person" and to seek a "personal God" is so "materialist" and "Atheistic" and so "un-spiritual" but is "religious".
(Don / September 20, 2006 - 19:02)
I hope and pray that the all mighty GOD has mercy on all of you all's soul. I pray that you all find comfort in GOD. Who do you think made you.
(Baptist / September 19, 2006 - 00:24)
"Atheism is a way of humility. It's to think oneself to be an animal, as we are actually and to allow oneself to become human."
(Atheist / September 14, 2006 - 06:19pm)
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!
HAPPY NEW CENTURY!!!
THE ALMIGHTY GOD´S TRUE NUCLEAR AND GLOBAL DEMOCRACY (TRUE GLOBAL INDIVIDUAL EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO REACH GOD´S BEST GIFTS) shall never exist for us in our America" - and in our "Free" "Nuclear" World - until HIS BASIC FUNDAMENTAL UNIVERSAL FUNCTIONAL LITERACY and HIS BASIC FUNDAMENTAL UNIVERSAL GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH INSURANCE are Legislatively (Constitutionally) compelled as a Fully Punishing Criminal Humanitarian Law that is until Our Insatiable Ultra-Filthy-Wealthy Corporative "American" Government so give the True Example OF SUCH A SACRED UNIVERSAL HUMAN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY for Our Whole Totally Exploited Suffering Illiterate and Health-Helpless "American" World!
The Almighty did not Inspire to write His Bible just for The Implacable "Sacrosanct" "Religiose" Corporations of the World to use It as toilet paper...
(Christian / September 5, 2006 - 11:00 pm)
feeling happy to be an unbeliever
(Atheist / August 30, 2006 - 00:56 pm)
"I had just gone through the material on line. I shall submit my comments later on.
Pl. send me more in this subject. Thanks.
(Hindu / August 29, 2006 - 03:59 pm)
a wonderwull author you didn't yet mention is Sam Harris, "the End of faith".
or go to www.samharris.org
(Ahoovah / August 27, 2006 - 11:20 am)
You shouldn't stop if you don't find the answer for your questions.. so you're end up stop believing God. If you compare to the Christian dogma and you don't satisfy (as I can see for clearly you refer or comparing alot to Christianity)..
Just remember the world has hundreds of faith, keep looking for the one which could explained best.
(Muslim / August 25, 2006 - 06:12 am)
in the name of religion, everybody cheat. Justify their misbehaves.
(Hindu / August 20, 2006 - 07:23 am)
you decide your world
(Deiste / August 18, 2006 - 01:32 am)
you decide your world
(Deist / August 18, 2006 - 01:32 am)
I do not know what I believe. But I do know what I don't.
(Agnostic / August 15, 2006 - 00:52 am)
I like your site, the humor is hilarious. I am Wiccan, but baptised catholic..... now do you think baptsing a baby is wrong? I sort of do, its like forcing religion on people but they don't even know...... i donno, e-mail me with your thoughts
(Wiccan / August 13, 2006 - 09:11)
To the "rationalist", what some religious people call "God" is really the ONE or the Unity of ALL of the varied parts of Creation and MORE (the GODHEAD). We can say that ALL (creation) is ONE (Creator) stuff. The Buddhists and some Eastern mystics place the ONE (GOD) into the "imaginary" with a "Zero". God is "not this, not that", they claim. The Mind then to make sense of these two concepts of the ONE/Zero, modified itself to communicate that abstract intellectual experience and philosophical knowledge. As a species, we developed a concept of the ONE before we evolved into using a concept of "Zero" in mathematics and then for the Creator. We can say that "Zero" is a useful imaginary (as in Time) evolution while ONE is a real or eternally changing Reality (as in Space). We can not doubt that there is "something" created. We exist. So to say that Zero is what created that "something" is as paradoxical as stating that the ONE simply IS and that IT created, at some arbitrary point in time the ALL (Creation) that we experience in a flow that we measure in space units and recently in TIME units.
The physical Reality was and is in Space and can be measured in meters. Our measurement of the "Reality in Space" with Time units (seconds) is a recent evolution as we, as a species, become more "abstract" and evolve into the "imaginary" and the "virtual". ONE is REAL, ZERO
is Imaginary until we find something real in what now seems like "Nothing". Zero is what we look into for the NEW!! Some look for the ONE in the Zero! Some seek the Zero in the ONE and the ALL! Mathematically and intellectually, it does not "compute" without some new Math.... ONE IS, Zero is
NAUGHT (NOT)!!! So 1 + 0= 1 and 1 - 0= 1 and 0 - 1 = -1 !! Is there an "anti God" as there is anti-matter? IF Zero is the ONE GOD, then How, When and Why the transition to a Creation (ALL)?? Nothing or zero can exist inside ONE but ONE cannot exist inside NOTHING without destroying it's quality of "NOTHING-ness".
(Don / August 11, 2006 - 08:04 pm)
I'm a filipino. i came from a christian country. but i really do not believe about the mentioned existing gods. and their beliefs. but i still believe that there is a begining, (a god, or anything else, maybe)... but im a more technical person, i do not rely on things that are ilogical.
(Agnostic / August 10, 2006 - 00:37 pm)
this is a crap poll get a life you stupid nerds
(Christian / August 9, 2006 - 05:51 am)
I am a Pagan. Yes, I believe in God...well, I believe in many Gods and Goddesses. I am also very scientific and study physics in my free time. A contradiction? Of course not!
(Other / July 31, 2006 - 06:30 pm)
ATHEISM, the belief that there is no "God", is certainly a belief that can be shown or proven to be TRUE in certain situations.
If God (or Gott), the variation on the name given to the "Creator" or "Supreme Deity", by the Germanc tribe, the Goths (also meaning God) and the Visigoths, (meaning Children of God or Goth)in the middle ages is to be accepted today instead of the choices of other cultures: eg.Yahweh, Elohim, Allah, Manitou, or any other non-judeo cultural concept of, and word for, the "Creator", such as the Father or Male Principle, the Greek Logos or the Atlantean ONE or the modern Sci-fi, the "FORCE" or the "SOURCE", then "God", (or Goth) by that definition, would portray that German tribe that invaded Europe, including Rome and Spain, in the Middle ages (circa 400 CE), as "GODS" and that can be said to be "NOT TRUE". There is no Goth civilization anymore. There should then be no Goth, Gott or God either and and although the historians claim that the "GOTHS" invaded Europe, to accept for ours, the word for the "Supreme Deity" of an extinct invading horde is not "high intellect" or logical. The Goths are now called Schandanavian, Hungarian, Germanic, etc..The name of our global "UNITY" should also change to a more "modern" and all encompassing "WORD".
The true Globally accepted phrasing of the question could then be one that is more scientific or intellectual or logical:
Is there a First Cause? Or is there a Unity (or Grand Unified Theory ie GUT) or a Unified Field Theory? Or A SINGULARITY at the Beginning of Time or even a Big BANG and/or is TIME itself a reality at all and not just a "tape measure"? Should TIME be given the Status of a "Dimension of Space" as we have done for 100 years now (almost)???
To believe that the answer to those questions is "NO" although irrelevant, is atheistic though not dogmatic and does not stop the conversation or the question: Is there a ONE, now? NOW? NOW??and on and on....
So we are still together or United and talking or dialoguing!!!
(4d-Don / July 31, 2006 - 00:56 am)
I think you have a good sight I personaly cant not believe I guess you would probably say that it is subconscious fear but I respect that and have thought about that to. I was just wondering what compelled you to make this site. I find that the Universe is ultimately lack of meaning other than what we give it even with God the chain justification of value makes it obvious. But I was wondering what do you believe ethically and why is religion so BAD. What do you do when you think of death or meaning or family I have personaly figured this out the best I could but I still don't understand how materialism is any more superior to anything else. On a lighter note I really liked your comparative religion joke page. Good Luck!
(Christian / July 29, 2006 - 09:06 pm)
In opinion, religious theories contradict themselves. If believing in god requires accepting certain faith, then by default a believer is tempted to deny belief in god to people of other religions. To paraphrase, if there is one god, why are then so many faiths!? I am tempted to categorize atheism as a belief, for it asserts a belief of people that there is no god. So atheism can be a form of faith, a new religion.
(dardania iliricum / July 29, 2006 - 06:57 pm)
Jesus still loves all of you!
( :) / July 24, 2006 - 08:28 am)
Now that we have various number systems (real, integers, rational, irrational, etc)
that go into the complex and "imaginary" numbers with their various algebras (vector, quaternion, octonion, etc...), we as a species are developing theories that do not need a First Cause or a God. The dogmatic religious support for the "Big Bang" theory is now challenged by the more Spiritual "No-Singularity" theory that allows for eternal "Little Bangs", and the created-from-nothing "Big Bang" is retreating daily. The Branes theory (the source of the saying: it's a "no-braner") allows for "No-singularity" and no "Big Bang" but theorizes energy "membranes" that come together, and touch at irregular intervals of time and space to create "little Bangs" and/or whole Universes or Multiverses eternally.
As Science advances to fill the void of Space, with energy, matter and the products of the Mind, God and/or Religion retreats to fill the realm of "Spirit". Spirit could then be seen as just a more rarified form of energy than Matter and Mind.
Just a thought of inclusion!!
(Don / July 23, 2006 - 10:48 pm)
My nationality is Scottish it wasnt on the list.
(Atheist / July 21, 2006 - 09:10 am)
I need it for research purposes
(Catholic / July 14, 2006 - 07:55 am)
If God exists, than it is a waste of thought to either believe or not believe in him. If God doesn't exist, what's the need to not believe in him?
(Joshua / July, 13 2006 - 04:51 am)
Creo que después de la muerte, siguehabiendo materia (átomos, etc.)
(Atheist / July 12, 2006 - 02:18 am)
I was raised Catholic. When I was 28 years old, I became fed up with the frustrations that believing in a god had always brought. Once a god was taken out of any/every equation, everything I experienced and observed made much more sense. I no longer pretend to have an answer when one is not present or easily obtained. Thank you for this website.
(Atheist / July 4, 2006 - 07:32 am)
I like this website.
(Other / July 4, 2006 - 06:47 am)
I would like to see this site with less jokes (Yes, I know those pious people are the most funny) and with more projects to garantee freedom for non believers. To protect normal people from the risks that comes from those "freedom of religion" movements that do nothing but garantees the rights of one being a fanatic.
(Atheist / July 4, 2006 - 00:40 am)
I love visiting your sight!! keep up the great work!
(Hindu / July 3, 2006 - 03:13 pm)
religious education was force fed to me at an early age. I regurgitated it and it has since left a nasty taste in my mouth.
(Atheist / July 1, 2006 - 01:29)